Entry tags:
QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, AND CONCERNS
CUSTOMER SERVICE Anything you want to address under the guise of anonymity? Just want to ask a private question without the hassle of messages? Please comment here with your troubles and they will be addressed as soon as possible. All comments will be screened and responded to as screened. DIRECT MOD CONTACT ![]() ![]() (HEAD MOD) aim: kiss in rye plurk: email: agrandissmant@gmail.com ![]() ![]() (LIST MOD) plurk: ![]() ![]() (LIST MOD) plurk: |
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 02:57 am (UTC)(link)Just a few quick things, re: the recent guide on how the network works. Many people had assumed that, instead of the character's fullname, it would be an ID number of sorts instead, which could then be matched in their phone's 'contact' list to a name and house number. This is because, otherwise, it completely nullifies the idea of a character introducing themselves? I know lots, lot of threads have characters telling their names to one another, and having to retcon that looks a little silly. In addition, it's sort-of a basic, first thread interaction to have?
TL;DR, perhaps nix the 'name' part in network posts? But if not, thank you for taking the time to read this anyway. :)
no subject
When I mentioned the part about aliases, that's basically creating a username for themselves which can be the DW username they have or something they make up, though the rule does stand that abusing ridiculous names would get kicked out (just more landlord magic which would also cut down on possible posts where the point is just like HEHE GUESS WHO I AM WHILE MY NAME IS SEYMOUR BUTTS or something to that effect). This can of course be edited with more clarification! So don't fret about retconning or anything, as what everyone has been doing is a-okay, but I just need to reword it better and a bit added on.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-03 03:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
Does this necessarily apply to all canons with their spin offs. For example, if someone applies from Soul Eater, can they also play a character from Soul Eater Not (other examples: if someone plays a character from Star Trek, could they play from Star Trek: TNG; if someone plays from Touhou: Mountain of Faith, could they play another character from Touhou: Scarlet Weather Rhapsody; if someone plays from Buffy, could they play from Angel)? The installments of the aforementioned canons in these cases are all connected in some way or another (some much more than others, some hardly so). Some canons can have the possibility of characters interacting, have a character only hear of the other, or simply not have the character interact with another at all. The amount of potential interaction would depend on the character themself; for example, a main character like Buffy does have the likelihood of interacting with those in the Angel cast more than any side character from Buffy.
As you can see, character hogging across such canons with a wide rage of installments and characters and worry for self-interaction does not need to be an issue with these kinds of characters. So basically, if a case can be made to show that two characters from the same umbrella canon are not likely to interact, let alone hardly know of each other, and/or simply would not interact at all, would it be possible to app that character?
It would be helpful to unscreen this question and any answer you may give for others who I know would be interested. Or, I'd ask permission to c/p the answer you give to those who are interested. Thanks!
no subject
If I let one person do it with an argument that was valid and had to turn another person down, then things could get messy pretty fast, not to mention with canons that are still active this could be a huge problem if an interaction in spin offs do arise (weirder things have happened). So I am going to have to say no, that one character per canon is going to extend to the canons universe as well.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-03 05:30 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-12 07:19 pm (UTC)(link)That way we can see where there is a need to be filled.
I know school is about to end for the summer but, in the future/next school year something like this could be helpful I think.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 05:11 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-06 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)Just something to consider...!
no subject
If you look at the locations, there is one! It's just that no one does anything with it and really hasn't since the game opened.
no subject
But this is a good idea! I usually just keep stuff up since there's a chance someone will want it, but I'm thinking I'll do kind of an auctioning off OOC post where if you want the business then you can have it but they'll be deleted in a week or so (from the post). Who knew restaurants were so popular.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-04-25 02:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
However, a vast majority of players have HMDs that you can use and if not, reporting problems to the mod account will result in them being forwarded to the person. So tl;dr it wasn't useful and there's other ways to give crit outside the meme.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-17 12:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-21 03:01 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I understand having to hiatus and taking strikes when shit hits the fan or if something is unavoidable, medical issues, work schedule changing, etc. So I am a fan of both of these things and am very understanding and forgiving when it comes to them!
However, if someone is purposefully trying to pull the wool and just be inactive on purpose while staying, I find this rude to players and myself. There isn't a specific rule about this BUT if you would like to reply to this with their name + characters they play (just so there is 100% no confusion), I will leave that screened and talk to them about this because it's uncalled, rude, and I am most certainly not okay with this.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-29 03:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-08-11 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-16 12:31 pm (UTC)(link)no subject